Rendered at 18:42:39 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
bramhaag 12 hours ago [-]
My account got closed for inactivity while I had multiple apps published. Google does not understand the concept of a finished app apparently, and requires you to continuously push updates or else you permanently lose your account with no way of reopening it.
realharo 12 hours ago [-]
I have just one app I published way back in 2014 or so, and I think there were only 2 updates (only counting changes that required uploading new builds) since then that were like "do this or we're taking the app down".
One of them was requiring a privacy policy, even for a fully offline game that doesn't even have the internet permission. The other one was having to update the target platform version if I remember correctly.
WA 10 hours ago [-]
Target platform must be updated every year now in August. They started doing this a couple years ago.
maybewhenthesun 12 hours ago [-]
They do the same with youtube accounts. My parents lost a ton a family movies that way. No warning either, just poof -> gone.
Teever 12 hours ago [-]
The worst part is that they probably didn't delete the data and are using it to train models.
baranul 11 hours ago [-]
Exactly. Think Google/YouTube pulls this type of stunt to fully seize user information and data, so that they can do whatever with it.
Giving users true recovery mechanisms, means possible removal of all or part of the collected data. Where sudden or out of the blue seizure and complete removal of the user's ability to access or recover, means it's now all their data.
hn_submit 6 hours ago [-]
I do like the concept that developers need to put in some effort to keep the app in the app store. Otherwise there'll be millions of orphaned apps and thousands with duplicate functionality.
By mandating a yearly effort the number of apps will fall through attrition and your app stands a bigger chance to get noticed.
ryandrake 4 hours ago [-]
You're right that a policy like this favors newcomers. Buy why is being "old" and/or "done" seen as bad in software? We need more developers to embrace "done" and stop changing software for the sake of changing it. Most of the software I use, I like just the way it is. I don't want more features. I don't want the UI to change (again). I don't want AI and chat in them. I don't want to have to upgrade my operating system just to keep using them.
hn_submit 2 hours ago [-]
It's not about newcomers. You merely need to update the API level which is something you can do in a few hours. It's mostly an update of the app version, retrieve the SDK for the API level, recompile and go through the motions in the Play Store.
You don't need to add features if you don't want to.
clifdweller 3 hours ago [-]
they aren't asking to make changes. It is android is constantly evolving so basically their 'hope' is every app developer will rebuild with latest android and test on a modern device and proactively fix or remove an app if it doesn't. Plenty of apps crash on startup and not a great user experience to be the consumer that finds the crash so pushing it back to dev to do this yearly is a reasonable expectation.
ryandrake 2 hours ago [-]
I don't think it's reasonable to change an OS in such a way that apps which did not previously crash on startup now crash on startup. Unless there is some huge change, like moving from one CPU architecture to another, apps should not even have to be rebuilt, let alone modified, just to keep working year after year.
nobody9999 55 minutes ago [-]
>Unless there is some huge change, like moving from one CPU architecture to another, apps should not even have to be rebuilt, let alone modified, just to keep working year after year.
And, as history teaches us[0], not necessarily even then.
Brett Victor’s Earth Primer, one of the most fantastic educational app for Earth. The team has long ago disbanded, so - let’s delete it without trace? Seriously?
Both are subject to abuse. There are many Indian companies offering services to hike your user count, positive reviews and ratings.
zx8080 11 hours ago [-]
> Google does not understand the concept of a finished app
They do! They just hate it.
pjmlp 9 hours ago [-]
How else they would force new API adoption?
Apple does the same thing.
Alternative are having applications in 2026 that use POSIX like in UNIX System V, or Win32 like in Windows 95/NT 3.51.
weikju 9 hours ago [-]
> Alternative are having applications in 2026 that use POSIX like in UNIX System V, or Win32 like in Windows 95/NT 3.51.
If only……
pjmlp 8 hours ago [-]
I do confess that I would rather have those than Electron garbage.
m4rtink 7 hours ago [-]
Well, FDroid has many apps that are basically done, open source & build from said source. Thats how it should be done.
pjmlp 7 hours ago [-]
That has nothing to do with what I was saying on my comment, and there is a reasoning on Google and Apple's attitude, it isn't only money grabbing.
For starters, there are many "done" apps that are like Swiss cheese in terms of security.
jsiepkes 8 hours ago [-]
> How else they would force new API adoption?
And that would have been fine, if Google hadn't tried to shove the Google Play Store ecosystem down everyone's throat by throwing up barriers for side-loading apps and such.
rbits 8 hours ago [-]
Just don't show the apps in Play Store search/recommendation. There's no need to completely remove the apps
pjmlp 7 hours ago [-]
When APIs get replaced they won't work anyway.
People love to bash how Microsoft manages Windows, yet they keep forgetting that Microsoft is one of the few OS vendors that actually keeps the APIs around, instead of having a deprecation process, finalised by actually removing the APIs, or hard forcing the new behaviour.
It happened to me too. And they didn't even refund my $20 or so.
vrganj 12 hours ago [-]
Gotta drive engagement bro! Line must go up!
ur-whale 12 hours ago [-]
> requires you to continuously push updates
Sounds like a perfect job to automate by an always-on LLM.
heckelson 11 hours ago [-]
What happened to simple cron jobs?
fortyseven 8 hours ago [-]
I don't think cron can write code. Jokes aside, I suppose you could just alternate between two lines of code and just publish alternating patch versions. What a stupid situation, fuck Google.
cube00 12 hours ago [-]
I got a Google survey this week.
Which of the following are the reasons you chose Google Play related issues as one of the weaknesses?
The second option, written by Google was:
- Sudden account termination without actionable feedback or clear restoration guidance
They know they're killing accounts without due process, they don't care, why would they? They're the only game in town now the Android Developer Verification Program is in force.
myaccountonhn 12 hours ago [-]
The person creating the survey might be trying to gather data to raise with management.
SillyUsername 12 hours ago [-]
It gets better, I too had my account closed for inactivity, but I STILL get emails from them I can't stop because I can't log in to change email preferences.
4pkjai 12 hours ago [-]
I got banned from Google Admob (or whatever it is called now) and they still send me promotional emails.
skeledrew 11 hours ago [-]
Mark as spam.
zx8080 11 hours ago [-]
That's how OKRs work!
binsquare 12 hours ago [-]
Almost sounds like one of the intentional product decisions
cosmotic 11 hours ago [-]
That's illegal. No private right of action though. Gotta go through your ISP or FTC, assuming you're in the USA.
johnnyApplePRNG 55 minutes ago [-]
Pichai is literally sitting down to dinner with Trump regularly now so ... good luck with that.
skeledrew 11 hours ago [-]
Mark as spam.
SillyUsername 7 hours ago [-]
Bit of an issue if your mail provider is Gmail.
skeledrew 5 hours ago [-]
I don't think they'd be brazen enough to not honor user pref in the mailbox. Although it just might also make it more likely that they can such users at the slightest thing.
11 hours ago [-]
hn_submit 11 hours ago [-]
I wonder if an anti-trust lawsuit would have any chance of succeeding. The Android Developer Verification Program is clearly meant to prevent alternative app stores from gaining market share under the guise of "security."
I think it's reasonable that Google mandates that developers identify themselves when publishing on its own app store. But why would they need to do so on alternative app stores if those don't require it?
IIRC the Android Developer Verification Program was only initiated after the EU mandated alternative app stores to be allowed. That would be sufficient cause for an anti-trust indictment.
Has anyone informed the EU about this?
BTW an anti-trust lawsuit would also have a reaonable chance of moving forward in the U.S.
littlecranky67 11 hours ago [-]
I don't know why Google Play Store/Android in general has a good reputation - in my opinion they got worse than Apple. I recently created apps for both stores, and the Google experience is so bad. Because I am an individual (sole trader) I cannot go down the business route - but need to go through the 12 testers route. That is, I need to find 12 people willing to join a google group, opt-in to beta testing, and have my app installed for 14 days at the same time before I can publish the app on the Play Store. This is ridiculous. I'd rather pay a lump sum as I did for the Apple Store: 99€/year, go through App review, publish.
I had to submit my id, private bank statements (we often don't have monthly utility bills in europe, so I had to submit bank statements) and click through a ton of wizards for compliance, and of course pay 25€. Still no publishing rights. Now I would just pay some clickworkers on Fiverr to fulfill the testing criteria, but that risks getting my account (and app) banned forever. Needless to say that google now has all my private data associated with my google account.
People always say walled garden to the Appstore, but at least the entry ticket has a clear price label.
ryandrake 4 hours ago [-]
What a ridiculous policy. I dabbled in iOS development for a while, over 10 years ago, and published an app that probably got 10 users total, when it was available to everyone. I don't think I even know 12 people who would test an app for me.
ourcat 11 hours ago [-]
And all that, for them to then put your private home address (assuming you're not a business) on the app page?
I haven't bothered with them for years now, since the way they treat indie devs is absolutely awful.
And the 12 people/14 days things was a complete show-stopper. Two arbitrary numbers completely pulled out of someone's arse.
m4rtink 7 hours ago [-]
Why not just put it on F-Droid or self publish it rather than go through this bullshit ? :)
littlecranky67 5 hours ago [-]
Because the App is not open source - F-Droid requires OSS software. And yes, there is private repositories that users could manually add, but users won't find you by browsing the F-Droid appstore. F-Droid alone is a tiny fraction of users of Android, and F-Droid users that deal with private repos is a fraction of that fraction. Not worth to bother with that, no one is going to use your app then.
sharts 12 hours ago [-]
There’s Googlers on HN reading these who could probably fix this but won’t.
mertbio 12 hours ago [-]
Unless you offer them a promotion ;)
indrora 10 hours ago [-]
No they need to find a way to glue a chat service onto it.
unrented7977 5 hours ago [-]
What is this, 2010? You have to glue an AI assistant to it or you're never getting a promotion
The question is: does Android Developer Verification Program actually help improving the .apk app store experience?
Probably not. Google is notoriously bad at customer support (for both devs and consumers)
monksy 12 hours ago [-]
They also love keeping malware apps on the play store as well. I tried reporting an app that took over one of my parents phone. It stayed up for quite a while. I'm sure it's still up.
jjav 10 hours ago [-]
> Google is notoriously bad at customer support
Had to LOL at that understatement. Google invented the ultra-aggressively non-existent customer support model.
zb3 10 hours ago [-]
But now we have Gemini 4 Argon, and you know, agents (they boast it's so good at that stuff), so customer support should improve soon, RIGHT??
ahartmetz 6 hours ago [-]
Imagine an LLM trained on Google customer "service"...
wg0 12 hours ago [-]
Euqally - there should be a way to recover your account.
watwut 12 hours ago [-]
"App store experience" was continually degrading. I used to be able to find small apps and games I liked a lot and basically binge downloading. The last few times I tried, I ended up with nothing useable.
vrganj 12 hours ago [-]
It helps centralize control over what was advertised to be an open OS.
Wait, what was the question again?
shams93 14 hours ago [-]
Fortunately PWA are well supported on android, half the apps on my phone are PWA and I didn't need an app store or hacking my device to install them. But I moved from native android to PWA after having hellish issues with their automated developer nightmare system.
littlecranky67 11 hours ago [-]
PWA support got worse on the latest android. They removed the clear "Install" button and copied iOS, that is you have to scroll down a long list and select "Add shortcut" / "Add to home screen". IIRC they removed the "install" wording.
ninalanyon 12 hours ago [-]
Can PWAs operate with local data? Can they interact with data from anywhere in the file system?
Aldipower 12 hours ago [-]
yes, with the File System API, it needs user permission though (which is a good thing).
famouswaffles 11 hours ago [-]
Permissions are fine, but on android they happen every single time for the same file (and there's yet no option for the 'Allow everytine' that is present on desktop chrome). This is pretty horrible UX for some use cases.
merelydev 11 hours ago [-]
PWAs are awesome but Firefox does not support them, you can only install them with Chrome based browsers. So it is still largely Googles ecosystem and they can fuck with it like they are doing with android apps.
seszett 11 hours ago [-]
I have had PWAs with Firefox for years, they work well.
I have published a number of apps through my work, I created a personal account and it even asked if I had a work and I provided it.
But it doesn’t seem to provide me with anything because I still have to go through this process of “get 10 friends to test this for X weeks” before I can even submit my app for review.
Now I have to go through this weird side system where people just download peoples apps to get past that gate….
This seems more insecure than anything else.
woadwarrior01 11 hours ago [-]
Same! I ported my free iOS utility app[1] to Android because a lot of people were asking for it. Just before I could publish it, they closed my Play Store account for a year of inactivity. Now, I haven't been able to re-create the Play Store account. Every time I try, money gets debited from my card, but the process ultimately fails. TBF, the money gets refunded after a month or so.
Google employees can pat themselves on the back for a job well done putting the same hurdles in place for software development that apply in a country 3rd last on the World Press Freedom Index.[1][2]
I don't understand the link between publishing an app and freedom of the press
dhx 9 hours ago [-]
See for example Rosado et al. v. Blanche et al., 1:26-cv-01532[1] which is an active case addressing whether the US federal government suppressed the first amendment rights of the "Eyes Up" application developer by pressuring Apple to remove this application for crowd-sourced recording/reporting of ICE incidents. An injunction has been granted with the following finding:[2]
"the Court finds that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that Defendants violated their First Amendment rights through coercion of Facebook and Apple."
My reference to a press freedom index is due to a lack of "countries by freedom of software development" index. If such index existed, the methodology may have some commonality with a press freedom index.
Placing barriers in front of publishing of books, online content, software, etc all leads to some suppression of speech. The question is whether the benefits of the barriers placed outweigh the risks/negatives. In this case, why should anyone care what the passport number or residential address is of a student interested in a career in software development who is writing their first Android game?
Had the exact same thing. Developed a small game, pushed it to iOS without much fanfare (well, other than having to pay the insanely high toll to get into the garden) and then turned to Android to do the same. Another toll gate at only a quarter the price - sure, lets pay that as well. But then we get to the point where they require images of government issued id and address verification. You can have my money, buddy, but that level of personal data for something small like a game? How about no…
Aozora7 12 hours ago [-]
Google take $25 once, Apple takes $100 every year. For hobby projects, the former is reasonable, and the latter is a dealbreaker.
I'm surprised Apple doesn't make you scan your ID since there are laws that force both Apple and Google to publish real names of developers on app store pages. And address too, if you charge money.
xaitv 12 hours ago [-]
Imo even the $25 is too much or at least promotes inequality. Plenty of countries with developers where $25 is a full day's wages, but for the average American software dev $25 is almost nothing.
littlecranky67 11 hours ago [-]
With the changes they did recently, unless you find 12 people opting-in to google groups for your beta test and downloading a private build from a beta-tester link, keeping the app installed and engage with it for 14 conescutive days, your game is NEVER published on Play Store at all. And that is AFTER you submit government ID and paid the 25 bucks.
Only companies can now have instant publishes on the Play Store without that 12-tester limit.
Aozora7 8 hours ago [-]
It sucks, but it's more of a time gate and an inconvenience than an actual barrier. There are communities/apps where people do this for each other in an organized way, so you're pretty much guaranteed to pass after 14 days.
I published my first app a few months ago, and I hated 14 days part more than 12 people part.
littlecranky67 8 hours ago [-]
> so you're pretty much guaranteed to pass after 14 days
Then why have it in the first place?
I don't complain about the money because my time to organize and go through this is worth more than the price difference. I'd rather pay 100€/year, same as on the Apple Appstore. Now I have to coordinate some fake weird closed-testing groups and hope I don't get banned for using unauthentic testers.
Aozora7 8 hours ago [-]
>Then why have it in the first place?
The inconvenience/effort is probably the point, likely to discourage people who aren't willing to put at least that much effort.
>and hope I don't get banned for using unauthentic testers.
I doubt Google cares about this, since they let apps for these testing groups into play store. Those apps organize people into groups, provide play store links, and buttons to open other people's apps, so all you do is just open and close each app once a day.
Since this takes like 30 minutes total over 14 days, I'd rather do that than pay $100 forever since I'm not made of money and it's less time than it would take me to earn $100 at my job even once.
littlecranky67 5 hours ago [-]
What you doubt doesn't matter, google clearly even requires you to fill out details about the testing process, how you recreuited your testers, etc. [0]. This is mandatory. Good luck trying to fill in "I used Fiverr to recruit some chinese clickworkers". Any if you are lying about the process - well If Google doesn't like your App or anything about you in the future, they can just delete whatever your App is citing false claims on your side.
>Any if you are lying about the process - well If Google doesn't like your App or anything about you in the future, they can just delete whatever your App is citing false claims on your side.
They could do that for any reason or no reason at all anyway even without the testing requirement.
Blibberwock 12 hours ago [-]
They do if you want to distribute your apps in the EU. And your physical address will be published as well.
ChrisRR 9 hours ago [-]
I'm not sure this is actually correct. From what I've read, if you're in one of the 4 countries where this rolled out today then you can still install unsigned APKs on play protect devices, but the device needs to enable sideloading and then there's a 24 hour wait. After that unsigned APKs can be be installed as usual
bob1029 9 hours ago [-]
Android used to be the open option for me. I moved to Apple because I got tired of buying a new phone every 12 months and dealing with really bad OS updates (bricked phones). It felt like a major sacrifice at the time. Looking back at android in 2026, I don't see any remaining upside.
reddalo 11 hours ago [-]
They took away our freedom of installing apps on the devices we own.
dariosalvi78 11 hours ago [-]
the browser is the best tool we have now to fight the duopoly and its absurd rules.
Funnily, or depressingly, a lot of people here on HN are against the browser, either because "the UI doesn't look native" or because of security/privacy issues, with regular apps shipping with hundreds of MB or spyware you have no control of.
Let's push for the browser to become more feature rich, more secure and more universal. Or maybe for another OS altogether?
maeln 11 hours ago [-]
> the browser is the best tool we have now to fight the duopoly and its absurd rules.
The browser, this infamous neutral platform fighting against Google and Apple duopoly by having the two biggest browser made by... Google and Apple ?
Joke aside, the state of the web and browser is depressing right now. Sure, we get webusb and webgpu, and all new fancy spec, and are slowly turning the browser into the final portability layer of the OS. But at what cost ? All browsers are now chrome with a layer of paint. Safari only continues to exist because of iPhone, and everyone is apparently moving on from Firefox.
I keep using FF because I don't want the web to become a Google monopoly, but it's getting harder and harder. Google services that I have to use for work are becoming buggier and buggier on FF, I had big SaaS with bugs making them unusable on FF too. Even a government software I have to use... Nobody seem to QA on FF anymore.
ahartmetz 6 hours ago [-]
From what I have seen, the WebKit team is actually pretty nice. They are more accommodating to outside developers than the Blink team. It still feels like the open source department at Apple while the Blink team is more like Google corporate development team 38 which happens to reluctantly publish source code.
famouswaffles 11 hours ago [-]
Apple won't allow it. They've crippled PWAs on Safari and just let the tech languish, you can't have any other web engine on IOS other than Safari's WebKit, and it takes 6 steps to install a PWA on Safari (so you just know 99% never will).
I wouldn't say that it's "production ready" or anything, but I've recently tried KDE Plasma Mobile on an old phone, and it's actually good - not perfect - but I think that if I were to just gove it to someone to play around with, I wouldn't get a "wtf is this weird nerd thing?" response from them
ur-whale 12 hours ago [-]
Did you thing it was still the 2000's or something?
That you were still free to write code, put it out there and have people use it freely?
A decade ago, I made a joke comment to a friend that you were soon going to need a carry permit to operate a compiler.
Joke's not so funny in 2026.
userbinator 12 hours ago [-]
A decade ago, I made a joke comment to a friend that you were soon going to need a carry permit to operate a compiler.
Richard Stallman's Right to Read (1997) made a similar observation.
trilogic 10 hours ago [-]
Right to intelligence, is he same. Denied with clear discrimination on same grounds (It may be used for malicious purposes :) which is also true, so access was/is/will be restricted to limited resources. Hard to swim against the stream unless you fly above it.
lenkite 11 hours ago [-]
So, the guy that HN loves to mock and poke fun at - Richard Stallman - was utterly correct after all.
jjav 10 hours ago [-]
Yes, rms was always correct. Freedom must never take a backseat to convenience or this is how it ends.
ButlerianJihad 10 hours ago [-]
Don’t forget “imitate”. HN comments are often indistinguishable from rms screeds, in sentiment, misogyny, and agenda, and political extremism.
JuniperMesos 9 hours ago [-]
rms isn't a misogynist. He is a political extremist though, for the political cause of free software.
ur-whale 7 hours ago [-]
> So, the guy that HN loves to mock and poke fun at - Richard Stallman - was utterly correct after all.
Yes, he was correct indeed.
But the fact that the message was broadcasted by a dude rocking the personality of a psychotic 4 year old and the general looks of ... let's not go there ... basically prevented everyone with a normal outlook on life to pay attention.
There's this famous chapter of the Little Prince that depicts this exactly, "asteroid B-612" :
Yes, fuck Android though I have to use an Android phone(and I don't want fucking Apple either). I pulled my hobby game from play store because they won't just let it be. Some new regulation now and then and threats to disable the app.
fsflover 11 hours ago [-]
> I have to use an Android phone(and I don't want fucking Apple either)
There are third alternatives, too (GNU/Linux phones).
nev3rfail 12 hours ago [-]
Yes, fuck it. This is beyond insane, apparently I cant distribute apps just in GitHub "releases" section anymore without Google's approval. I hope some EU antimonopoly something will fry their asses.
You still can distribute unsigned APKs via github, but the devices that install it will need to wait 24 hours the first time they enable sideloading in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand. After that they can install APKs as normal
vrganj 12 hours ago [-]
I've been reaching out to my MEPs over this. I would encourage other EU citizens to do the same.
geff82 12 hours ago [-]
... just developing for Linux has always had it's own attraction: the one of being free to do what you want.
rawoke083600 12 hours ago [-]
Honestly, I agree!
I paid my fee - $20 or $25, I can’t quite remember - but when I couldn’t reliably enter or find my physical home address via Google Maps because of some weird street-name issues, I never got to complete the process!
vardump 11 hours ago [-]
You might be able to fix those "weird street-name issues" yourself in Google Maps.
monegator 11 hours ago [-]
I just recently reopened an account that was closed due to inactivity.
Lucky me i manage different accounts, because the new way to get help for developers is to do that through play console.
But if your account is suspended, you get always redirected to a page that tells you the account is suspended.
Looking at other ways to get to the help portal.... when you select you need help for developers, yep you're redirected.
So because i have another developer account, i could open a support ticket. I had to write the same message to the fucking bot at least three times, which was funny because the answer was more or less a rephrasing of my message, and every time it would add the rephrasing again, and again.
At the fourth time something must have happened because it was escalated, and then i had my account back.
I was actually open to making a new account, which i wrote several times, it's only that i needed to get back the app IDs because you know, the app is installed in places.
Now, it's the first of october and i have constant nagging for unregistered package names on another account: this is for apps that are suspended for bullshit reasons, which i can't reinstate because the bot is in loop mode around the same wrong rule violation (like: i can't make a basic / pro version of my app now? pro version is too simillar so it must be blocked?) and i can't register the package name because it's suspended, an i can't reinstate it because loop. I can't delete it because it's suspended, an i can't reinstate it because loop.
Fucking brillant!
10 hours ago [-]
sehw 12 hours ago [-]
I switched to GNU/Linux on my GPD MicroPC 2 ;)
ChrisRR 9 hours ago [-]
The GDP MicroPC 2 ships with Windows. How is that relevant?
mrsssnake 12 hours ago [-]
Honestly, beyond my deGoogled Android smartphone and a GNU/Linux laptop I am looking around for pocketable device between those. Mecha Comet looks like a perfect fit, but it is not released yet.
Another person discovers the binary certificate cartel.
delis-thumbs-7e 12 hours ago [-]
Why does anyone even dev for G or A - unless you get a big pay check from either ? Every time I look into mobile dev I just go “yep, NOPE!” and go to have a shower. And it seems to just get worse and worse? Are both app stores going to be full of just unusable vibe coded crap in few years time?
voidUpdate 12 hours ago [-]
Because at my work, clients want the general public to be able to install their apps sometimes, and my department does native apps, a different department does web stuff. If you want Joe Public to be able to install your app, you have to go through the Google or Apple stores.
However, we don't directly dev in Kotlin or Swift, we use Unity, which can export directly to an APK, or an XCode project (which has to be compiled a second time which is a nightmare). Sometimes we have to write native plugins to access device specific features (Last time I needed to was to access the FoV of the device's main camera), but it's not common, Unity has great support for most things you want to do out of the box
EDIT: I forgot, there are some situations where we supply an android or ios app to clients through our own app store, but I believe that devices have to be "enrolled", especially for ios. Generally though, Joe Public will want apps through the official stores
0xcrypto 12 hours ago [-]
The app I am trying to publish is a PWA but needs a CORS policy bypass for which I have created a small proxy. This proxy needs to be running natively on the device.
john01dav 12 hours ago [-]
Either because their vision of what they want to make needs a mobile form factor and can't be a website (possibly due to marketing causing users to reject mobile websites), or (and I suspect that this is the bigger driver) the pay from the stores (even after the ridiculous 30% cut + bureaucratic insanity) makes it worth it (possibly under the category of getting "a big pay check", but it sounds more like you mean employment).
ChrisRR 9 hours ago [-]
Because you develop for your users devices obviously
applfanboysbgon 12 hours ago [-]
> Why does anyone even dev for G or A
Because personal computers are a legacy platform for nerds and programmers, and smartphones are the most widely used consumer computing platform in the world. This desperately needs regulation. Unfortunately the EU is currently regulating the duopoly into law, making their phones necessary for ID verification, so we're probably completely fucked for at least a decade or two before we even have a chance, but that's still not a reason to shrug our shoulders and accept it.
Aldipower 11 hours ago [-]
I won't call it exactly legacy.. Nerds still provide an attractive market. :-)
jorisw 12 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
applfanboysbgon 12 hours ago [-]
That is indeed a perfect description of your comment.
zx8080 11 hours ago [-]
Users will go use Apple. The next round of enshittification is on. As no competition with "open" anymore.
One of them was requiring a privacy policy, even for a fully offline game that doesn't even have the internet permission. The other one was having to update the target platform version if I remember correctly.
Giving users true recovery mechanisms, means possible removal of all or part of the collected data. Where sudden or out of the blue seizure and complete removal of the user's ability to access or recover, means it's now all their data.
By mandating a yearly effort the number of apps will fall through attrition and your app stands a bigger chance to get noticed.
You don't need to add features if you don't want to.
And, as history teaches us[0], not necessarily even then.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-code_machine
https://earthprimer.com
They do! They just hate it.
Apple does the same thing.
Alternative are having applications in 2026 that use POSIX like in UNIX System V, or Win32 like in Windows 95/NT 3.51.
If only……
For starters, there are many "done" apps that are like Swiss cheese in terms of security.
And that would have been fine, if Google hadn't tried to shove the Google Play Store ecosystem down everyone's throat by throwing up barriers for side-loading apps and such.
People love to bash how Microsoft manages Windows, yet they keep forgetting that Microsoft is one of the few OS vendors that actually keeps the APIs around, instead of having a deprecation process, finalised by actually removing the APIs, or hard forcing the new behaviour.
https://developer.android.com/guide/app-compatibility
Sounds like a perfect job to automate by an always-on LLM.
Which of the following are the reasons you chose Google Play related issues as one of the weaknesses?
The second option, written by Google was:
- Sudden account termination without actionable feedback or clear restoration guidance
They know they're killing accounts without due process, they don't care, why would they? They're the only game in town now the Android Developer Verification Program is in force.
I think it's reasonable that Google mandates that developers identify themselves when publishing on its own app store. But why would they need to do so on alternative app stores if those don't require it?
IIRC the Android Developer Verification Program was only initiated after the EU mandated alternative app stores to be allowed. That would be sufficient cause for an anti-trust indictment.
Has anyone informed the EU about this?
BTW an anti-trust lawsuit would also have a reaonable chance of moving forward in the U.S.
I had to submit my id, private bank statements (we often don't have monthly utility bills in europe, so I had to submit bank statements) and click through a ton of wizards for compliance, and of course pay 25€. Still no publishing rights. Now I would just pay some clickworkers on Fiverr to fulfill the testing criteria, but that risks getting my account (and app) banned forever. Needless to say that google now has all my private data associated with my google account.
People always say walled garden to the Appstore, but at least the entry ticket has a clear price label.
I haven't bothered with them for years now, since the way they treat indie devs is absolutely awful.
And the 12 people/14 days things was a complete show-stopper. Two arbitrary numbers completely pulled out of someone's arse.
Probably not. Google is notoriously bad at customer support (for both devs and consumers)
Had to LOL at that understatement. Google invented the ultra-aggressively non-existent customer support model.
Wait, what was the question again?
Now if it is plain old CRUD style application, many that are webviews packaged as APK, sure.
https://progressier.com/what-web-can-do-today
But it doesn’t seem to provide me with anything because I still have to go through this process of “get 10 friends to test this for X weeks” before I can even submit my app for review.
Now I have to go through this weird side system where people just download peoples apps to get past that gate….
This seems more insecure than anything else.
I'm happy supporting iOS, macOS and web.
[1]: https://cleanlinks.app/en
[1] https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/doc/start/rna-00000...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Press_Freedom_Index#Rank...
"the Court finds that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that Defendants violated their First Amendment rights through coercion of Facebook and Apple."
My reference to a press freedom index is due to a lack of "countries by freedom of software development" index. If such index existed, the methodology may have some commonality with a press freedom index.
Placing barriers in front of publishing of books, online content, software, etc all leads to some suppression of speech. The question is whether the benefits of the barriers placed outweigh the risks/negatives. In this case, why should anyone care what the passport number or residential address is of a student interested in a career in software development who is writing their first Android game?
[1] https://www.fire.org/cases/rosado-et-al-v-blanche-et-al
[2] https://www.fire.org/sites/default/files/2026/04/Memorandum%...
I'm surprised Apple doesn't make you scan your ID since there are laws that force both Apple and Google to publish real names of developers on app store pages. And address too, if you charge money.
Only companies can now have instant publishes on the Play Store without that 12-tester limit.
I published my first app a few months ago, and I hated 14 days part more than 12 people part.
Then why have it in the first place?
I don't complain about the money because my time to organize and go through this is worth more than the price difference. I'd rather pay 100€/year, same as on the Apple Appstore. Now I have to coordinate some fake weird closed-testing groups and hope I don't get banned for using unauthentic testers.
The inconvenience/effort is probably the point, likely to discourage people who aren't willing to put at least that much effort.
>and hope I don't get banned for using unauthentic testers.
I doubt Google cares about this, since they let apps for these testing groups into play store. Those apps organize people into groups, provide play store links, and buttons to open other people's apps, so all you do is just open and close each app once a day.
Since this takes like 30 minutes total over 14 days, I'd rather do that than pay $100 forever since I'm not made of money and it's less time than it would take me to earn $100 at my job even once.
[0]: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...
They could do that for any reason or no reason at all anyway even without the testing requirement.
Funnily, or depressingly, a lot of people here on HN are against the browser, either because "the UI doesn't look native" or because of security/privacy issues, with regular apps shipping with hundreds of MB or spyware you have no control of.
Let's push for the browser to become more feature rich, more secure and more universal. Or maybe for another OS altogether?
The browser, this infamous neutral platform fighting against Google and Apple duopoly by having the two biggest browser made by... Google and Apple ?
Joke aside, the state of the web and browser is depressing right now. Sure, we get webusb and webgpu, and all new fancy spec, and are slowly turning the browser into the final portability layer of the OS. But at what cost ? All browsers are now chrome with a layer of paint. Safari only continues to exist because of iPhone, and everyone is apparently moving on from Firefox. I keep using FF because I don't want the web to become a Google monopoly, but it's getting harder and harder. Google services that I have to use for work are becoming buggier and buggier on FF, I had big SaaS with bugs making them unusable on FF too. Even a government software I have to use... Nobody seem to QA on FF anymore.
That you were still free to write code, put it out there and have people use it freely?
A decade ago, I made a joke comment to a friend that you were soon going to need a carry permit to operate a compiler.
Joke's not so funny in 2026.
Richard Stallman's Right to Read (1997) made a similar observation.
Yes, he was correct indeed.
But the fact that the message was broadcasted by a dude rocking the personality of a psychotic 4 year old and the general looks of ... let's not go there ... basically prevented everyone with a normal outlook on life to pay attention.
There's this famous chapter of the Little Prince that depicts this exactly, "asteroid B-612" :
https://www.patternrecognition.asia/jin/prince/english/lpe04...
There are third alternatives, too (GNU/Linux phones).
I paid my fee - $20 or $25, I can’t quite remember - but when I couldn’t reliably enter or find my physical home address via Google Maps because of some weird street-name issues, I never got to complete the process!
Lucky me i manage different accounts, because the new way to get help for developers is to do that through play console.
But if your account is suspended, you get always redirected to a page that tells you the account is suspended.
Looking at other ways to get to the help portal.... when you select you need help for developers, yep you're redirected.
So because i have another developer account, i could open a support ticket. I had to write the same message to the fucking bot at least three times, which was funny because the answer was more or less a rephrasing of my message, and every time it would add the rephrasing again, and again.
At the fourth time something must have happened because it was escalated, and then i had my account back.
I was actually open to making a new account, which i wrote several times, it's only that i needed to get back the app IDs because you know, the app is installed in places.
Now, it's the first of october and i have constant nagging for unregistered package names on another account: this is for apps that are suspended for bullshit reasons, which i can't reinstate because the bot is in loop mode around the same wrong rule violation (like: i can't make a basic / pro version of my app now? pro version is too simillar so it must be blocked?) and i can't register the package name because it's suspended, an i can't reinstate it because loop. I can't delete it because it's suspended, an i can't reinstate it because loop.
Fucking brillant!
However, we don't directly dev in Kotlin or Swift, we use Unity, which can export directly to an APK, or an XCode project (which has to be compiled a second time which is a nightmare). Sometimes we have to write native plugins to access device specific features (Last time I needed to was to access the FoV of the device's main camera), but it's not common, Unity has great support for most things you want to do out of the box
EDIT: I forgot, there are some situations where we supply an android or ios app to clients through our own app store, but I believe that devices have to be "enrolled", especially for ios. Generally though, Joe Public will want apps through the official stores
Because personal computers are a legacy platform for nerds and programmers, and smartphones are the most widely used consumer computing platform in the world. This desperately needs regulation. Unfortunately the EU is currently regulating the duopoly into law, making their phones necessary for ID verification, so we're probably completely fucked for at least a decade or two before we even have a chance, but that's still not a reason to shrug our shoulders and accept it.
Go and vibe-code your mobile OS. Lol.